Connect with us


Modi – Not The Leader India Wants, But The Leader India Needs



Narendra Modi Congratulated by President

Prime Minister Narendra Modi being congratulated by President Pranab Mukherjee. Source

Much has been said about Narendra Damodar Modi before, during and after the Lok Sabha elections in India, which are a mammoth exercise of democratic clout that leave much of the world in awe. Many oppose this man over his “questionable” human rights record and his perceived right wing image. But most of India made an unmistakably unanimous decision to elect this man. Although the decisive mandate that the NDA has gotten is not a new phenomenon, given the situation that India finds herself in today, it’s crucial. Why? Because there’s a revolution coming. How do I know this? Lets see.

One might remember the recent article that Shashi Tharoor wrote for The Huffington Post that garnered a lot of attention India-wide merely because a Congressman had poured praises for Modi. This apparent act of blasphemy wasn’t received well by many within the Congress and the mindless cronies of the party couldn’t digest the fact that one of their own had praised their enemy even before the dust of their crushing defeat had settled. Despite Tharoor’s insistence that this piece wasn’t meant to imply an overnight transformation of Modi into a champion of secularism and inclusiveness, but rather meant to convey the fact that Modi is beginning to take steps in the right direction to repair his image among the activists and minorities, many within the Congress party still crucified Tharoor for it. Not all politicians were prepared to be as open minded as Tharoor to commend Modi on taking all the right decisions and inspiring those in Delhi from the very beginning. Now they lie in wait… waiting for him to make a mistake and to tear him to shreds. Until then, in their own words, “We’ll wait and see.”

But what must really be highlighted is the first speech Modi gave in the parliament on 11th June. It wasn’t merely a speech filled with bullet points from their election manifesto. It wasn’t a chest-beating session to demean the parties whose corpses BJP had crossed to reach the summit. It was a dream. A dream that Modi has clearly dreamt many times over and he was trying to persuade the nation to dream it as well. But what makes this speech different from all the others, one might ask?

The answer is simple. In this one, the idea of an “Andolan” i.e. Movement was introduced. Modi urged his fellow Indians to make the agenda of development a Jan-Andolan or People’s Movement. He drew parallels to the movements that Mahatma Gandhi inspired that helped India gain freedom from the shackles of foreign rule. He begged each and every Indian to live and work for the country. He said that even a person sweeping the streets must do it for the country and so should a teacher teaching a bunch of students.

Why is this approach noteworthy? Why should any of us care about these antiquated notions of “Desh-bhakti” and living and dying for the country, and so on? The answer is simple yet profound. Societies always need a purpose to move forward. Over many millennia, that purpose has been provided by religion, but in India’s current complicated religious turf, religious beliefs are causing more division than cohesion. In such a situation, the idea of working out of love for the motherland is the next best thing. All of us know in our heart of hearts, what the cold hard truth is. We do not really care about what happens to the nation, as long as we get what we want. We litter on roads, pay bribes to get our work done, take bribes to do our work, store money away in offshore bank accounts (in case we are the top 1% that has enough money to do so) and the list goes on. Our level of desensitization and callousness on various societal issues is already pushing the limits of saturation. Upper middle class families like to sit with their evening chai to discuss the vagaries of the political and bureaucratic system of India and how this nation is doomed. In such a situation, Modi wants to unite the nation and give us a common purpose, which is to work for the nation. To do everything we do, solely for the betterment of Bharat Mata, an approach that helped galvanize a sleeping nation into action and finally gave us our independence after much struggle. He said, “Desh ke liye mar nahi sake. Desh keliye jiyenge.” [We couldn’t die for the country, but we’ll live for it]. Although the image of Bharat mata is quite recent (came up when the nationalist movement was beginning to catch up among the masses), the concept of giving one’s life for the nation is entrenched in Indian culture. The Kshatriyas or the warrior class of our society would pledge to lay down their lives for Dharma or Duty and their matra-bhoomi or Motherland, to protect the lives of innocents. This concept was drudged up during the Indian Freedom movement and evolved into what we see today (mostly in our armed forces). If we as a nation are successfully able to adopt this ideology of “living and working for the country”, we work for not just ourselves but for everyone and that in turn goes around. Think of the possibilities!

This probably is the biggest reason why Modi is the leader India needs – to help along a paradigm shift in our society as a whole. Companies and organizations over the years that have made the greatest impact on a global level have done so because there was always a leader at the helm who held a vision. He clearly articulated the vision to his people. He made them dream the same dream. He made them want it as much as he did. And then they vigorously worked towards it overcoming all odds to achieve the desired result. This Lok Sabha speech was the first step towards creating tangible change – an exercise in making 1.4 billion people dream the dream of development and good lives. Modi spoke about capitalizing on the state of Sikkim’s impressive strides in the organic food industry and making the northeast a hub for organic food export, and collecting real time agri-data in the supply chain of food supply to avoid rotting of the surplus stock. He urged ministers to STOP PSYCHO-ANALYZING victims of rape and just shut their mouths and do their job to curb the dismal situation of women’s safety and security in India. This is probably where Modi shattered his right wing conformist image. As someone seen as a staunch proponent of Hindutva and an agent of the RSS, people expect the likes of Modi to blame the victims for rape and shift the blame onto movies and pornographic content on the internet. Instead, Modi emphasized on helping the victims of these heinous attacks and spoke of working effectively to curb them. He also asked ministers to think of themselves as “Janta ke Doot” or Agents of the people.

He made various points concerning development and governance, all inclusive and at regular intervals, re iterated that he will take every MP along; regardless of their party and that they will act as agents of the poor and underprivileged. They will work solely for the benefit of the repressed and help them ascend in society. He made no distinction on the basis of cast or religion. He made no mention along the lines of affirmative action, only action along the lines of poverty. Very importantly, he spoke about using education as a weapon against poverty and backwardness – something we all know, but nobody bothers to work on. And he highlighted the importance of burnishing the brand of “Skill India” to come out of the current image of “Scam India” – perhaps a testament to his pro-development image.

Modi’s cleanliness policy, his devotion to work and his insistence that other who work with him adopt the same work ethic, the value he gives to time management and personal health… All these make him an ideal manager. His vision makes him a great leader.

When all the aforementioned qualities converge into one person, he becomes the leader than India needs to unshackle herself and move ahead in the world. He becomes… Narendra Damodar Modi.

Continue Reading


A Historical exploration of Khajuraho



khajuraho temple

The UNESCO world heritage temples of Khajuraho are situated in the Bundelkhand region of Madhya Pradesh. Built by the kings of Chandela dynasty during 950 to 1050 AD, these exquisite temples were lost to the world from 13AD onwards till they were discovered by the British in 1838 under the cover of dense date palm trees.

 This collection of Hindu, Buddhist and Jain temples are Khajuraho temples are famous for art on stone. Variously described as living temples, Temple of Love and consisting of unique erotic sculptures the Khajuraho group of temples are considered by many to be the pinnacle of India’s temple art. The temple complex creates an eclectic mix of spirituality, eastern philosophy, architecture and cultural heritage.

Khajuraho is best visited during winter on account of its extreme climate. Summer months can be very hot. The famous Khajuraho Dance Festival is held in March and attracts visitors from across the world.

 Khajuraho is well connected to major cities by train and by air. The airport is 5km from the city centre and links to Delhi, Agra and Mumbai. It is best recommended to use a trusted cab service provider like Savaari, where you can make an online booking by downloading the Savaari App.

Western Group of temples.

 The Western group of temples have the largest of the temples and are richly decorated and form the main area of attraction

  • Lakshmana Temple – The temple dedicated to the Hindu trinity of Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva is the oldest of the Khajuraho temples and has some the finest sculptures that can be seen in India.
  • Kandariya Mahadeo Temple – This Shiva temple is covered with beautiful carvings, sculptures and frescos that are known for their beauty, grandeur and finesse.
  • Devi Jagdamba Temple – This relatively dainty temple dedicated to Goddess Jagadamba has three bands of sculptures and the uppermost layer has some of the most erotic sculptures that Khajuraho is also famous for.
  • Chitragupta Temple – One of the rare temples of the Sun God in the country.
  • Vishwanath Temple – The temple is unique for its colossal bull statue dedicated to Nandi, the favourite companion of Lord Shiva.

Eastern Group of Temples

  • Parsvanath Temple – The Jain temple shows an eclectic mixture of Hindu, Buddhist and Muslim influences in its three roof architecture.
  • Ghantai Temple – This Digambar Jain temple has a beautiful frieze inscribed on stone depicting the 16 dreams as seen by the Mother of Lord Mahavira. The temple though gets its name from the remarkable pillars, carved with chains and bells.
  • Brahma Temple – Among the oldest temples in Khajuraho, the temple is built entirely using granite and sandstone and dedicated to Lord Vishnu.

 Southern Group of Temples

  • Chattarbhuj Temple – Situated 3 km from the main city, the temple is the only one in Khajuraho without any erotic sculpture and faces west. Best visited during the sunset, the temple is known for the intricate and beautifully detailed four-armed idol of Lord Vishnu.

Do remember to attend the Light and Sound Show conducted in the Western group of temples that describes the horary past of these beautiful monuments.

Khajuraho is surrounded by other places of interest, such as the Panna National Park and the Ranneh Falls. Do plan your visit and hire outstation or local cabs from the airport to visit these temple complexes.

Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse

Continue Reading


Explore the royal city of Mysore



Call it the Heritage City or the City of Palaces, the city of Mysore still emanates a feeling of au royale even in a 21st century India. A place of heritage for royal families, sultans, and legendary names in history, every corner of Mysore is steeped in stories of victory, power, and grandeur. A tour of this majestic city is only justified when you explore the royal heritage of the City of Palaces.

Getting there

Conveniently located on the southern edge of the Karnataka State, Mysore is easily accessible from major cities. It takes about three hours to travel the 152 KM distance from Bangalore to Mysore.

History and Heritage

The city of Mysore served as the capital for the Kingdom of Mysore between the 1300s until 1956. These six centuries saw the kingdom change hands of rulers and kings, from the Wadiyar Dynasty, Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan. But the common element of all the rulers was their penchant for art and culture. Under their patronage, they contributed to the city’s visual and cultural glory which earned Mysore the fame of Karnataka’s cultural capital.

A royal tour

If you want to experience the regal side of Mysore, you cannot but miss these structures of historical and architectural significance. You can join a heritage walking tour to explore the city on foot, or head from Bangalore to Mysore by car and stop by at monuments, palaces, and museums and learn about the legends that made Mysore. You can start your walk from the Town Hall, built in 1884, as a tribute to the first Dewan of the city.


Mysore Palace- The official residence of the royal family of Wadiyars, the palace itself is a work of marvel. An overwhelming blend of   Indo-Saracenic, neoclassical, Indo-Islamic and Gothic architectural works, the Mysore Palace is a breathtaking sight. Built in 1912, the palace is a UNESCO World Heritage Site and boasts delicate works of mirrors, stained glass, mosaic and more. On any given day, you will find more tourists here than even at the Taj Mahal. Every Sunday, the palace comes alive with 97000 light bulbs bedazzling its façade and the premises.

Lalitha Palace– Yet another heritage building, the two-storied Lalitha Mahal sits on a ridge at the foothills of the Chamundi Hills, which makes for a great vantage point. The palace was transformed into a hotel and offers a royal stay. If you truly want a feeling of royalty, then a stay here would be an experience.

Jaganmohan Palace– One of the seven prominent palaces of Mysore city, is a stunning work of ancient Indian architecture with intricate interiors and exteriors. The palace, transformed into a royal art gallery since 1915, houses paintings of the royal family, art by Raja Ravi Varma and an array of rare and antique musical instruments.

Museums- Stop by the Rail Museum to explore the archaic steam engines, the Maharani’s saloon, and other railway souvenirs. There’s also the Jayalakshmi Vilas Mansion showcasing more than 6500 folk artifacts from all parts of Karnataka. The Folk Art Museum, one of the most visited in the city, is also known for its collection of toys, models, and figurines.

Crawford Hall- Built in 1947, this is a must visit historic structure in Mysore. The royal palace is now known as the Mysore University but still renders a rich heritage to its ambiance.

Small, medium or large-scale, every historical building and monument of Mysore has a majestic touch to it. And such architecture speaks of its glorious past, which has left traces for the modern civilization to explore.

Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse

Continue Reading


India’s Victory at the International Court of Justice is the World’s Challenge to the Status Quo

Manak Suri




For the past week, both the Indian and British media have rigorously covered the story of the re-election of India’s justice Dalveer Bhandari to the bench of judges in the International Court of Justice on Tuesday, November 21. That the Indian judge retained his position on the bench was not the sole reason for the story’s extensive coverage; his reappointment combined with the fact that it happened at the expense of the United Kingdom’s spot on the bench is why the story is making so many rounds… and no, that many Indians may see it as some sort of a comeback against Britain’s 200 years of colonial rule over the country is not the reason why it matters. It matters because this is the first time since 1946 that the UK has no judge on the ICJ bench, and that signals possible changes in the way international bodies govern and are governed. So what does this mean for India, for the UK and for the world at large?

The International Court of Justice

The International Court of Justice or the ICJ was established in 1945 by the United Nations as its principal judicial branch and is located in The Hague, Netherlands. Its job is to settle legal disputes between states that are submitted to it and give advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it. The court comprises of a total of 15 judges that are elected to 9 year terms by way of voting from both the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) and the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) separately. One third of the court is re-elected every three years, and no two judges of the same nationality may assume positions on the bench simultaneously. However, the rule that led to the deadlock between the candidates from India and UK is that a candidate must obtain an absolute majority in both the UNGA and the UNSC in order to be elected to the bench.

UN General Assembly vs UN Security Council: The Race in Numbers

On November 9 and November 13, in seven rounds of voting justice Bhandari secured between 110 and 121 votes from a total of 193 in the UNGA against figures between 68 and 79 secured by his British counterpart Sir Christopher Greenwood. However, among the UNSC, justice Bhandari lost out by 5 votes to 9 in favour of Sir Greenwood. In the face of uncertainty, the UK then pushed for a ‘joint conference’ under the rules of the court between the UNSC and the UNGA. Under the ‘joint conference’ three countries from each side then determine the name for the court. However, the rules do not mention the procedure to select these countries and understandably so, since the option was last invoked in 1921. Fearing not enough support from the council, criticism for invoking the charter, and harming its friendly as well as economic relations with India, the UK eventually chose to not follow through with the process and withdrew its candidature for the post. In the end, India secured the seat with a total of 183 votes out of 193 at the UNGA and all 15 at the UNSC.

There is More to the Victory than Meets the Eye

The result means different things for the parties involved and also for the balance of power and influence between countries. For the UK, there are hardly any positives to take away from this result amid already turbulent times. Many in the British media have viewed this loss as ‘a blow to British international prestige’ and the country’s acceptance of a diminishing role in global affairs. This was the UK’s second major defeat at the ICJ after it lost a vote by a margin of 94 to 15 countries in June when the UNGA voted in favour of referring the question of decolonisation and self-determination of the Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean to the ICJ, which is currently under its control. Many within and outside the country have also been quick to blame Brexit for the situation in which they find themselves today, arguing that the other states, especially the ones within the European Union would have been less willing to snub the UK had the UK chosen not to leave the alliance. In the face of defeat, British diplomats have continued to maintain that they are happy that their close friend India has won, but have also not been shy of hiding their natural disappointment at their own loss.

For India, their victory in having a judge win the contest in getting elected to the ICJ bench against a permanent member of the UNSC is more symbolic than anything else. It reinforces India’s image at the highest stage as a major emerging global player and its ability to bring in greater reforms that push for more involvement from developing countries and emerging economies. Also, having a judge on the ICJ bench gives India an edge over Pakistan in the case involving former Indian Navy Officer Kulbhushan Jadhav who has been sentenced to death by a Pakistan military court on the charges of espionage. True, a judge on the ICJ does not represent his/her country or their interests. However, as suggested by repeated criticism the court receives for being biased in favour of the states who appoint the judges, having a judge on the panel is certainly an asset for any country, no matter what the rules dictate on paper.

The most important takeaway from the whole episode far exceeds the ambitions of just the two countries and a race for a seat at the ICJ. India’s victory at the court reinforces the belief that power does not necessarily reside or has to reside with the ‘few global elite’, a sentiment which was expressed clearly when most member states of the UNGA backed India’s justice Bhandari to be re-elected against the choice of the permanent members or P5 of the UNSC. There seems to be an acknowledgment among the member states of the UN of the beginning of a change which sees an increasing shift in the balance of power away from the traditional powers of the world or the P5 – Britain, China, United States, Russia, and France. Of these countries, China was the only member to not have a judge on the ICJ between 1967 and 1985 till the final decision last week, when they were joined by the UK in the list. Last year, Russia was voted off the United Nations Human Rights Council. In the 2016 elections, France lost out on securing a position in the International Law Commission. While diplomats at the UN continue to maintain that there are no winners and losers here, that it is all part of a bigger picture, these developments undoubtedly mark diplomatic victories for the Group of 77 or the G77, a coalition of developing nations at the UN that have constantly pushed for an enhanced negotiating capacity. What remains to be seen is just to what extent they bring about a change in the status quo.

Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse

Continue Reading