The most important characteristic of a nation state is his sovereignty. But what can we do when the leaders of a country go rogue? Can we talk about a moral obligation to interfere with their domestic policy? America was crafted using two different visions. The first one, as Kissinger says, is that US can be a shining beacon for the rest of humanity – practice democracy at home and develop more efficient governance mechanisms. The other vision is that if American values and culture are so exceptional then US has a moral duty and must promote them overseas by any means. From an historical point of view, America was dragged into this type of policy. During the first years of the Cold War, United States were accountable for 1/3 of the world industrial production and at that stage it was already a superpower. After the end of the Cold War, one scholar, Francis Fukuyama said that the end of the Soviet Union is also the end of history: democracy, democratic pace and liberalism will be the foundation of our future. After Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Georgia, Somalia, Sudan and Syria we can say that the reality is somehow different and Fukuyama was wrong.
In the context of the Syrian crisis, we notice that being a superpower is not that easy anymore. After 1945, America was involved in proxy wars like Vietnam with officially deployed forces or in Afghanistan in the 70`s during the Soviet occupation – the geopolitical doctrine of containment policy. At that moment, offering support to Mohammed Omar or Jalaluddin Haqqani was a justified operational and tactical decision. Nowadays Mohammed Omar is the spiritual leader of Quetta Shura Taliban, the archenemy of US in Afghanistan. QST is the new face of the former Taliban regime and Haqqani is the founder of the Haqqani network, a strong terrorist and insurgent organization which also fights against US soldiers. We can also say that 30-40 years ago it was impossible to predict the 9/11 moment for instance or even the entire GWOT (Global War on Terror) started by George W. Bush.
With Afghanistan and Iraq, Americans proved to themselves and to the entire world that they still win a war with or without the support of the international community and with or without UN Security Council blessings. Also Iraq and Afghanistan operational theaters shifted and changed the nature of power. You can easily conquer a country but is very difficult to win legitimacy over its population – the old battle for hearts and minds – so in this moment the soft power and later, the smart power of Joseph Nye took the upper hand.
Syria and Iran are two different stories. With direct involvement from US, Syria can easily transform into the first serious proxy war after the fall of the Soviet Union. Going back in time, Syria was called the beating heart of the Arab World, nowadays Syria can be called the beating heart of all important strategic interests and geopolitical positions from our world: al-Assad regime, Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, US, UK, Russia, China, Israel and even Al-Qaeda wing Jabhat al-Nusra. When we are talking about this type of war the most important issue is the fact that innocent people are suffering so that is why being a superpower is not that easy anymore.
Think about Rwanda, think about Somalia or Darfur, we as an international community have the responsibility to protect populations which are affected by war and instability. Under this conditions the most important issue is that our international mechanisms and instruments are a little bit outdated or they simply cannot cope with the current complexity and interdependence. US must look into the future and must analyze every possible outcome of the Syrian crisis because in the long run this decision can erode or consolidate US position. We saw this thing in Afghanistan or in Somalia with the Black Hawk down moment.
Another important debate here is between sovereignty and responsibility to protect. If you start a war in order to protect somebody is it moral? In the end I think that the right of a person to live in a stable and secure environment outweighs any other law, right or principle. In the end it does not matter the nature of the regime as long as that government is capable to provide good economic governance, because we as individuals care more about our economic status rather than the nature of our country.
Our world is so complicated because security means different things for different entities. We are facing a wealth deficit dilemma, which means that if I want to increase my wealth, during that process I will automatically decrease the wealth of somebody else. In order to overcome this dilemma we need to understand that cooperation can be sometimes an alternative for competition.
Nepal Hindu Rashtra: Time to Wrap Up Communism?
Nepal abolished the Constitutional Monarchy in May 2008 and declared itself as a Federal Democratic Republic. There was a new hope in Nepal as it was becoming world’s newest democracy even though it had dissolved the Hindu Rashtra. However, the democracy in Nepal immediately got into the tight grips of leftists and communists backed by China. It has been almost 12 years since monarchy was abolished in Nepal. Interestingly, the Himalayan country has already seen 11 Prime Ministers in this period. Thus, leaving the Nepalese people still yearning for good and stable governance.
Re-establish Hindu Rashtra
As the political instability is growing in Nepal, people are demonstrating concerns about the future of the country. In fact, Nepalese citizens are unhappy with frequent interference by China and India influencing its unstable communist regime. More voices are now growing in support of reinstating the Monarchy and declaring Nepal as world’s only Hindu Rashtra (which by default offers full religious freedom to other religious minorities as per Hindutva concept of Sarva Dharma Sama Bhava – all paths lead to one).
Former Deputy Prime Minister of Nepal, Kamal Thapa said that if political parties do not recognize the seriousness of reinstating the monarchy, then the country will head for a period of darkness. “Recently, we’ve had high-ranking officials from India and China come to Nepal to try and solve problems within the ruling party,” he said. “We cannot let others dictate what we want to do.”
Communist Party All Set to Suppress Protests, By Force
Kamal Thapa has firmly demanded an all party meet to discuss reinstating of monarchy. Throughout the month of December, 2020 Nepal has seen anti communism protests across the country in support of reinstating the monarchy and Hindu Rashtra. Most importantly, the demand has become a nationwide mass people’s movement. So much so that the communist regime had to send a directive to 77 districts in 7 provinces. The directive suggests suppressing the protests by force. Nevertheless, Rashtriya Prajatantra Party and other royalist groups have ignored this threat from the communist regime. Protester groups have pledged to strengthen the protest in the coming weeks.
Nepal: Demonstration held in capital Kathmandu, demanding restoration of monarchy in the country. pic.twitter.com/TFjmKu9U9Z— ANI (@ANI) December 5, 2020
Role of China – Hope for Communism in Nepal
China’s ambassador to Nepal is known to have very close relationship with Nepalese Communist regime. In fact, She has been super effective in tilting Nepal’s posture towards its ideological partner, China. One of her greatest achievements in 2020 was artificially manufacturing a border conflict between Nepal and India. Consequently, souring relations between the two Hindu majority nations. In addition, she managed to silence Nepal’s communist government after China took one of Nepal’s border villages under its control. However, recent political turmoil in Nepal and a renewed demand for reinstating of Hindu Monarchy is showing that the situation is now out of Chinese hands
Role of India
Year 2020, was not a good year for India and Nepal relations. India was busy in controlling domestic Covid cases. On the other hand, China had launched an invasive campaign into Indian territory. In addition, India is always busy with Pakistan on its western borders. However, the surprise came to India when China was almost successful in creating a new border tension between India and Nepal.
Those who do not know about Indian government should note that the current ruling party in India finds itself ideologically opposite to communism. This further creates differences between the two countries.
Communist party in Nepal has blamed India for supporting the ongoing anti communism protests in Nepal. However, former advisor to Nepal’s PM has suggested there is no proof that India is fueling pro Monarchy, anti communism demand in Nepal.
Nevertheless, There are certain influencers in India who have, in their personal capacity, expressed support for reinstating the Hindu monarchy. Yogi Adityanath, who is the Chief Minister of an Indian state bordering Nepal, said in 2015 that Nepal should declare itself a Hindu Monarchy. Readers should note that in 2015 Yogi Adityanath was not the Chief Minister yet. However, today he is not only popular in south of Nepal, his popularity is growing in Nepal as well.
Will The World See the first Hindu Rashtra?
It is difficult to answer this question at this moment. However, Nepalese communist government could not resolve the political instability and in December 2020 Nepalese government dissolved the parliament. Nepal will see next elections in April – May 2021. Hopefully, the world will see Nepal’s 12th Prime Minister in 13 years or may be a Hindu King? Royalists and protester groups have expressed confidence in winning next elections. We have our eyes on Nepal for updates.
America’s Justice System – The Need For Reform
A recent poll by the National Opinion Research Centre revealed that 95% of Americans favour vital criminal justice reforms. This is hardly surprising, given that several people of varying racial, partisan and ideological dispositions have called out the justice system over its many failures throughout the years. Most Americans received the Trump Administration’s First Step Act as a step in the right direction, as about 60% of people approved the criminal justice reform bill according to a 2018 poll. However, many people still believe the justice system’s approach to crime is ineffective and needs dire change, and these are some reasons why.
Prison population and funding concerns
Research conducted revealed America has about 2.3 million prisoners, making the US the country with the highest incarceration rate globally. Experts estimate that the country’s prison population has grown by a whopping 340% over the past three decades; new prisoner admissions into jails are higher than prisoner release numbers. The cost of maintaining the nation’s prisons at taxpayers’ expense has inspired a lot of backlash and calls for budget cuts. According to research, slashed correction spending was the preferred option by most states to balance their budgets and redirect spending to other areas.
Minimum mandatory sentences
Minimum mandatory sentences are statutes that force judges to give defendants convicted of a crime the minimum prison sentence. Mandatory sentences rob judges of the traditional way of considering the defendant’s character and the unique circumstances surrounding offences. Even when represented by criminal defense attorneys with many years’ experience, defendants often succumb to prosecutors’ pressure to plead guilty or face more severe charges with higher mandatory sentences. The guilty plea bargain consequently resolves about 95% of both federal and state court cases. Research also shows that about half of inmates in federal prisons are doing time for drug offences- causing overpopulation in the prison system.
Growing number of people killed by the police
An estimated 1000 civilians are killed by police officers annually in the US. The frequency of police brutality cases over the years requires immediate reform to the American justice system. Data suggests that the incidence of fatal police shootings is higher among African-Americans than any other ethnicity, inspiring movements like the ‘Black Lives Matter’ campaign to press on with protests for significant police etiquette reforms towards coloured minorities. The police force faces incessant accusations of racial profiling, indiscriminate use of power, and poor discretion, which has led a reported 58% of Americans to think policing needs major reforms through measures like better-trained officers, and wearing body cameras.
Evolving public opinion on crime
Research released by the Sentencing Project and The Justice Policy Institute reveals that more people in conservative states are embracing preventive, rehabilitative, and alternative sentencing options for non-violent offenders. Most Americans now view the prevention of crime as the most vital function of the justice system, as 77% of Americans think that focusing more on character education and after-school programs would be cost-effective by reducing the number of people going to jail. Almost two-thirds of Americans also believe in the need for lighter sentences with more useful, reformative programs in prisons that will benefit inmates upon release. Therefore, support for harsh penalties that harden criminals and make them a more significant menace when reintroduced into society has dwindled.
The History Question: Is It Better to Remember or to Forget?
Years ago, a philosopher by the name of George Santayana said a phrase that fuels many debates to this day. His original saying is “those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”, although, many sources now present it as variations of “those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it”. The latter definitely has more substance to it in the light of the ongoing debate about how much history we should be learning and how.
Is It Better to Remember or Forget About the Past?
On one hand, Santayana was right. Learning about the past is essential in order for people to progress. One also shouldn’t overlook the importance of remembrance and paying respects to the dead, both those who pushed the progress forward and those who have fallen victims to major tragedies that could and should have been averted.
The main argument in favor of learning about the past is that its knowledge is necessary for preventing the same thing happening in the future. Having it one can see the signs and stop the tragedy before it gains momentum.
That’s sound in theory, but the reality is always different. For example, today people are surely forgetting, and the much-critiqued education system is only partially at fault here. Even the greatest of tragedies weren’t spared this fate. It’s a proven fact that about two-thirds of millennials today don’t know about the Holocaust, and this number is surely greater for generations that follow them. In the school history course, the subject of one of the greatest disasters in history is barely touched, if touched at all. And outside of a history classroom, one can only see small, but terrifying, glimpses of it at the Holocaust Museum and other museums that rarely attract many visitors. And now we are witnessing a rise of antisemitic crime.
Are these two facts related? Does the lack of awareness about the horrors done in the name of Aryan supremacy contribute to the fact that right-winged extremists seem to be gaining popularity again?
It does, but by how much? That is the question that no one can truly answer.
And what about other genocides? The Holocaust had the highest death toll, but it was far from the only genocide in history. And quite a few of those happened after World War 2 and before the memory of the atrocities against the Jews began to fade. This means that while forgetting history is a factor, it’s not the deciding factor in its repeats.
But what is that thing responsible for the reenactment of past mistakes and tragedies?
Learning. This is the important thing that is most often overlooked when citing Santayana’s famous saying. It’s not enough to learn about the past and know the facts of things that happened. It’s important to learn from those facts and put in place protections that will prevent them from happening again. And this is something that humanity, as a whole, has yet to succeed in doing.
Dwelling in the Past Can Be Just As Bad
One also shouldn’t forget that there is such a thing as “too much history”. The Bosnian War and genocide that happened there in the 1990s is a vivid example of how the past can be exploited by political powers. Used as a part of propaganda, which fueled the war, history can become a weapon in the hands of those who want to use it for their own goals.
And this is what humans have been doing since the dawn of time. There is always someone who will use any means necessary to achieve whatever it is they wish. This results in wars and genocides, and hundreds of smaller but no less devastating tragedies.
Therefore, the problem isn’t whether people should be learning history but human nature itself. Perhaps, teaching this can help fix this fundamental flaw and truly stop the worst of the past from repeating.
Improving the User Experience of Your Business Website
7 Secrets to Setting Realistic Goals this Summer
The Key Approaches To Strengthen Your Business’s Data Security
What Is Cryptocurrency And Why Is It So Volatile?
Marketing Practices That Could Remain After The Pandemic
National Police arrests 60 people for money laundering in Majorca
How to Expand the Services Your Business Offers
12 Travel Podcasts To Inspire Your Next Trip
Subsale Market an Attractive Prospect for Investors in Malaysia
Want to Offer International Shipping? Know Your Options First
Economy6 months ago
Seasif’s Franco Favilla discusses the post-Covid economy and the price of gold
Business11 months ago
Business Essentials to Cross off Your Checklist This Year
China6 months ago
Nepal Hindu Rashtra: Time to Wrap Up Communism?
India12 months ago
Humanity Endures During Coronavirus Pandemic
India12 months ago
Congress’s Electoral Enervation
China6 months ago
Ridiculous Tariffs on Wines – China Australia Trade War Explicated
Travel12 months ago
Have everything ready for your next trip
India6 months ago
Government Changing Syllabus to Include Sikh History in India