Connect with us


Denmark, regional powerhouse and global player



Denmark new global power


Denmark has proven its abilities to be a pro-active defense member of NATO and the EU. Now the country isn’t only a regional power, it’s also expanding its role outside of the geographical territory, becoming an international player in today’s geopolitical challenges.

Today, Denmark is proudly getting out of its comfort zone and moving into one of the areas that was until now reserved for a only a small group of power players – space. Denmark recently agreed to contribute 313 million Kroner ($51 Million) to the European Space Agency’s (ESA) projects, especially the International Space Station (ISS). Although it isn’t directly linked to Denmark’s defense, it is a strong sign of where Denmark stands in terms of spatial exploration and industry. In fact, Denmark’s first astronaut, Andreas Mogensen will soon visit the ISS.

“Within the next two years, we will have both an astronaut and a climate gauge sent up to the USS. With Denmark’s contributions, we are sending a clear signal about out participation,” said Sofie Carsten Nielsen, the minister for higher education and research. Nielsen said that the ESA’s sensational Philae mission helped to demonstrate the importance of space exploration – “it is important for me that we see an increased focus on how important the space industry is to our modern infrastructure and daily life” (1).

Back on earth, gravity has taken hold of Denmark and the future of its defense seems to be developing rapidly. Recently, Danish authorities have made it clear that they want to be on the frontline for any worldwide issue, recognized as a global power. During the recent events in Syria with the Islamic State (ISIL), Denmark’s two coalition parties agreed on punishing foreign fighters and have been discussing ways of implementing it. Social Democrats Spokeswoman Trine Bramsen said the government is to release further details of a new comprehensive anti-jihadist package and Morten Østergaard, Minister of Economy and Interior declared, “my position is that If someone is on their way down to help the Islamic State with their brutality, it should be stopped. We are obligated to stop Danish citizens from going to Syria and committing serious offences. There is no doubt that no Danes should be going to Syria (2)”.

But for Denmark, the Syrian issue became an international geopolitical problem, which Denmark is willing to face out of its borders. Morten Ostergaard recently declared that Denmark will do whatever it can to help Lebanon cope with the Syrian refugee crisis. “We in Denmark stress our commitment to finding a political solution to the ongoing Syrian crisis, especially on a humanitarian level, over the coming years” said Ostergaard after meeting Lebanese Interior Minister Nouhad Machnouk in Beirut (3).

Denmark also directly faced Qatar to address its indirect support of the Islamic State. If Qatar’s regime is officially supporting the coalition against the Islamic State, the government has been ignoring traffickers who use Qatar to launder money and fund terrorist groups. Critics have lately argued that the regime could easily put a stop to the flow of money, if they wanted to. “Qatar should be thrown out of the alliance. We are at war with the Islamic State and we can not have someone on the team that is also on the side,” said Søren Espersen, foreign Policy spokesman for the Danish People’s Party. “Economic sanctions can be an option,” added Holger K. Nielsen, former Foreign Minister, asking the U.S. to confirm the accusations against Qatar before taking any consequences. Ole Haekkerup, member of the Foreign Policy Committee would like to have a serious talk with Doha’s government along with the U.S. “There is an impression that Qatar is doing something criminal. We need to have a thorough talk with them,” said Haekkerup.

Today, Denmark has become a key country involved in this international challenge. Its place within NATO is also significantly shifting Denmark’s history within the alliance, as NATO has been seeking to share the burden of providing expensive defense equipment in an equal manner across the Alliance. In fact, a new multinational project is being launch to increase the availability of munitions to the Alliance. Denmark, once again is in the lead in the project, which is focused on air-to-ground precision-guided munitions (PGMs). It’s because of its recent on the ground experiences that Denmark is able to lead such projects today. “Danish experiences from the air operation over Libya in 2011 showed us that national munitions stockpiles are not always sufficient… and they cannot easily be re-supplied within the short timeframe needed during operations,” said Lieutenant General Per Pugholm Olsen, Danish National Armaments Director (4). “Therefore we must pursue innovative and more flexible approaches towards provision of munitions” he added.

This effort illustrates the success of the Smart Defence initiative and of Allies working together on armament matters. But it also shows Denmark’s proactive approach for equipment. Because of its recent engagement in Afghanistan, or even in Mali to support the French Armed-forces, and also because of what’s at stake today for Denmark’s sovereignty in Greenland and larger parts of the Arctic, Denmark is thinking in terms of ground force projection.

As Denmark is willing to partner with some European countries on a case-by-case basis on worldwide engagement, the Danes have now made a priority of being able to send out troops and sustain them on the ground wherever the mission calls them. That’s one of the reasons why the Danish government has partnered with France during their engagement in Northern Mali. From these experiences, the two countries are now able to develop partnerships in terms of strategy, as well as industrial cooperation. The idea behind it is to develop a comprehensive mutual strategy throughout defense matters in order to be able to work together in all domains, including strategy planning, industrial development, equipment sharing, training and on the ground cooperation. All of these components are adaptable to the different existing frameworks, either in a bilateral partnership, within the EU framework though European Defense, or within NATO.

With Denmark raising its voice within Europe but also for the Arctic, for the Middle-East, for Africa, we should soon see a significant shift in the Danish defense policy, as well as a reinforced Danish military.

(1) Denmark ups ESA funds ahead of first astronaut, The local DK, December 4th 2014
(2) Denmark prepared to get tougher on Jihadists, The Local DK, September 12th 2014
(3) Danish minister pledges to help Lebanon deal with Syrian refugee crisis, December 17th 2014, Daily Star Lebanon.
(4) Danish ministry of defense


Continue Reading


Nepal Hindu Rashtra: Time to Wrap Up Communism?



nepal hindu rashtra

Nepal abolished the Constitutional Monarchy in May 2008 and declared itself as a Federal Democratic Republic. There was a new hope in Nepal as it was becoming world’s newest democracy even though it had dissolved the Hindu Rashtra. However, the democracy in Nepal immediately got into the tight grips of leftists and communists backed by China. It has been almost 12 years since monarchy was abolished in Nepal. Interestingly, the Himalayan country has already seen 11 Prime Ministers in this period. Thus, leaving the Nepalese people still yearning for good and stable governance.

Re-establish Hindu Rashtra

As the political instability is growing in Nepal, people are demonstrating concerns about the future of the country. In fact, Nepalese citizens are unhappy with frequent interference by China and India influencing its unstable communist regime. More voices are now growing in support of reinstating the Monarchy and declaring Nepal as world’s only Hindu Rashtra (which by default offers full religious freedom to other religious minorities as per Hindutva concept of Sarva Dharma Sama Bhavaall paths lead to one).

Former Deputy Prime Minister of Nepal, Kamal Thapa said that if political parties do not recognize the seriousness of reinstating the monarchy, then the country will head for a period of darkness. “Recently, we’ve had high-ranking officials from India and China come to Nepal to try and solve problems within the ruling party,” he said. “We cannot let others dictate what we want to do.”

Communist Party All Set to Suppress Protests, By Force

Kamal Thapa has firmly demanded an all party meet to discuss reinstating of monarchy. Throughout the month of December, 2020 Nepal has seen anti communism protests across the country in support of reinstating the monarchy and Hindu Rashtra. Most importantly, the demand has become a nationwide mass people’s movement. So much so that the communist regime had to send a directive to 77 districts in 7 provinces. The directive suggests suppressing the protests by force. Nevertheless, Rashtriya Prajatantra Party and other royalist groups have ignored this threat from the communist regime. Protester groups have pledged to strengthen the protest in the coming weeks.

Role of China – Hope for Communism in Nepal

China’s ambassador to Nepal is known to have very close relationship with Nepalese Communist regime. In fact, She has been super effective in tilting Nepal’s posture towards its ideological partner, China. One of her greatest achievements in 2020 was artificially manufacturing a border conflict between Nepal and India. Consequently, souring relations between the two Hindu majority nations. In addition, she managed to silence Nepal’s communist government after China took one of Nepal’s border villages under its control. However, recent political turmoil in Nepal and a renewed demand for reinstating of Hindu Monarchy is showing that the situation is now out of Chinese hands

Role of India

Year 2020, was not a good year for India and Nepal relations. India was busy in controlling domestic Covid cases. On the other hand, China had launched an invasive campaign into Indian territory. In addition, India is always busy with Pakistan on its western borders. However, the surprise came to India when China was almost successful in creating a new border tension between India and Nepal.

Those who do not know about Indian government should note that the current ruling party in India finds itself ideologically opposite to communism. This further creates differences between the two countries.

Communist party in Nepal has blamed India for supporting the ongoing anti communism protests in Nepal. However, former advisor to Nepal’s PM has suggested there is no proof that India is fueling pro Monarchy, anti communism demand in Nepal.

Nevertheless, There are certain influencers in India who have, in their personal capacity, expressed support for reinstating the Hindu monarchy. Yogi Adityanath, who is the Chief Minister of an Indian state bordering Nepal, said in 2015 that Nepal should declare itself a Hindu Monarchy. Readers should note that in 2015 Yogi Adityanath was not the Chief Minister yet. However, today he is not only popular in south of Nepal, his popularity is growing in Nepal as well.

Will The World See the first Hindu Rashtra?

It is difficult to answer this question at this moment. However, Nepalese communist government could not resolve the political instability and in December 2020 Nepalese government dissolved the parliament. Nepal will see next elections in April – May 2021. Hopefully, the world will see Nepal’s 12th Prime Minister in 13 years or may be a Hindu King? Royalists and protester groups have expressed confidence in winning next elections. We have our eyes on Nepal for updates.

Continue Reading


America’s Justice System – The Need For Reform



A recent poll by the National Opinion Research Centre revealed that 95% of Americans favour vital criminal justice reforms. This is hardly surprising, given that several people of varying racial, partisan and ideological dispositions have called out the justice system over its many failures throughout the years. Most Americans received the Trump Administration’s First Step Act as a step in the right direction, as about 60% of people approved the criminal justice reform bill according to a 2018 poll. However, many people still believe the justice system’s approach to crime is ineffective and needs dire change, and these are some reasons why.

Prison population and funding concerns

Research conducted revealed America has about 2.3 million prisoners, making the US the country with the highest incarceration rate globally. Experts estimate that the country’s prison population has grown by a whopping 340% over the past three decades; new prisoner admissions into jails are higher than prisoner release numbers. The cost of maintaining the nation’s prisons at taxpayers’ expense has inspired a lot of backlash and calls for budget cuts. According to research, slashed correction spending was the preferred option by most states to balance their budgets and redirect spending to other areas.

Minimum mandatory sentences

Minimum mandatory sentences are statutes that force judges to give defendants convicted of a crime the minimum prison sentence. Mandatory sentences rob judges of the traditional way of considering the defendant’s character and the unique circumstances surrounding offences. Even when represented by criminal defense attorneys with many years’ experience, defendants often succumb to prosecutors’ pressure to plead guilty or face more severe charges with higher mandatory sentences. The guilty plea bargain consequently resolves about 95% of both federal and state court cases. Research also shows that about half of inmates in federal prisons are doing time for drug offences- causing overpopulation in the prison system.

Growing number of people killed by the police

An estimated 1000 civilians are killed by police officers annually in the US. The frequency of police brutality cases over the years requires immediate reform to the American justice system. Data suggests that the incidence of fatal police shootings is higher among African-Americans than any other ethnicity, inspiring movements like the ‘Black Lives Matter’ campaign to press on with protests for significant police etiquette reforms towards coloured minorities. The police force faces incessant accusations of racial profiling, indiscriminate use of power, and poor discretion, which has led a reported 58% of Americans to think policing needs major reforms through measures like better-trained officers, and wearing body cameras.

Evolving public opinion on crime

Research released by the Sentencing Project and The Justice Policy Institute reveals that more people in conservative states are embracing preventive, rehabilitative, and alternative sentencing options for non-violent offenders. Most Americans now view the prevention of crime as the most vital function of the justice system, as 77% of Americans think that focusing more on character education and after-school programs would be cost-effective by reducing the number of people going to jail. Almost two-thirds of Americans also believe in the need for lighter sentences with more useful, reformative programs in prisons that will benefit inmates upon release. Therefore, support for harsh penalties that harden criminals and make them a more significant menace when reintroduced into society has dwindled.

Continue Reading


The History Question: Is It Better to Remember or to Forget?



Years ago, a philosopher by the name of George Santayana said a phrase that fuels many debates to this day. His original saying is “those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”, although, many sources now present it as variations of “those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it”. The latter definitely has more substance to it in the light of the ongoing debate about how much history we should be learning and how.

Is It Better to Remember or Forget About the Past?

On one hand, Santayana was right. Learning about the past is essential in order for people to progress. One also shouldn’t overlook the importance of remembrance and paying respects to the dead, both those who pushed the progress forward and those who have fallen victims to major tragedies that could and should have been averted.

The main argument in favor of learning about the past is that its knowledge is necessary for preventing the same thing happening in the future. Having it one can see the signs and stop the tragedy before it gains momentum.

That’s sound in theory, but the reality is always different. For example, today people are surely forgetting, and the much-critiqued education system is only partially at fault here. Even the greatest of tragedies weren’t spared this fate. It’s a proven fact that about two-thirds of millennials today don’t know about the Holocaust, and this number is surely greater for generations that follow them. In the school history course, the subject of one of the greatest disasters in history is barely touched, if touched at all. And outside of a history classroom, one can only see small, but terrifying, glimpses of it at the Holocaust Museum and other museums that rarely attract many visitors. And now we are witnessing a rise of antisemitic crime.

Are these two facts related? Does the lack of awareness about the horrors done in the name of Aryan supremacy contribute to the fact that right-winged extremists seem to be gaining popularity again?

It does, but by how much? That is the question that no one can truly answer.

And what about other genocides? The Holocaust had the highest death toll, but it was far from the only genocide in history. And quite a few of those happened after World War 2 and before the memory of the atrocities against the Jews began to fade. This means that while forgetting history is a factor, it’s not the deciding factor in its repeats.

But what is that thing responsible for the reenactment of past mistakes and tragedies?

Learning. This is the important thing that is most often overlooked when citing Santayana’s famous saying. It’s not enough to learn about the past and know the facts of things that happened. It’s important to learn from those facts and put in place protections that will prevent them from happening again. And this is something that humanity, as a whole, has yet to succeed in doing.

Dwelling in the Past Can Be Just As Bad

One also shouldn’t forget that there is such a thing as “too much history”. The Bosnian War and genocide that happened there in the 1990s is a vivid example of how the past can be exploited by political powers. Used as a part of propaganda, which fueled the war, history can become a weapon in the hands of those who want to use it for their own goals.

And this is what humans have been doing since the dawn of time. There is always someone who will use any means necessary to achieve whatever it is they wish. This results in wars and genocides, and hundreds of smaller but no less devastating tragedies.

Therefore, the problem isn’t whether people should be learning history but human nature itself. Perhaps, teaching this can help fix this fundamental flaw and truly stop the worst of the past from repeating.

Continue Reading