Connect with us


#JMBG Protests: Protesting for Basic Rights and Facilities to the New-Borns in Bosnia and Herzegovina



JMBG protests in bosnia

My words represented here are my personal views and opinion. Here I am observing yet another example of international media curtain this time in Bosnia and Herzegovina. I have been actively following the protests in Turkey, Brazil, Bulgaria, and now in Bosnia and Herzegovina. What I realize is that now people around the world are awakening. They understand that government is because of them and not the other way round. Everyone has an almost similar demand from their government. Somewhere governments responded by brutal attacks on the protesters and somewhere governments appeared to be sleeping and not listening.

Thank you! RT @TWRnews: Support from India, Russia, Romania, UK, US and Singapore #ДАНСwithme #BulgariaExists
— Antonia KokalovaGray (@Siberant) June 21, 2013

Amidst all this what I realized is that media curtain on the East European countries still prevails. The discrimination is not only limited to Bulgaria’s and Romania’s entry to Schengen but is also on the media coverage of Bulgaria and Bosnia and Herzegovina’s protests where people in thousands have taken to the streets rallying against their governments peacefully with some sincere demands.
The protests in Bosnia and Herzegovina are not just because of loopholes in their policies but also the ignorance and the behaviour with which government responded is against general humanity. Protesters want their government to end inter-ethnic argument about petty and trivial matters. There is a loophole in Bosnia and Herzegovina’s legal system that has brought thousands of citizen on the streets protesting over failure of lawmakers to agree on new legislation on citizen’s identity number. This is preventing the new-borns since February from getting registered. Being unregistered means no passport and no medical care cards. 
There has been an ongoing dispute for past two years between the Muslim, Croat and Serb lawmakers who have been brawling over a draft law on PIN (Personal Identification Number). Until the dispute is settled, Bosnia and Herzegovina’s constitutional court has ordered a halt to the registration on new-borns. This PIN is necessary for all necessary documents, proofs and services. Such examples in the legal system of Bosnia and Herzegovina has caused problems in the country’s path to joining European Union. 

How did the protests take the current avatar? 

Thousands of protesters without carrying any banners or posters encircled the parliament placed candles on the ground and stood peacefully to mourn the death of a three month old baby which became the victim of government’s not so well thought policies. 

Dvadesetorica nastupaju #jmbg
— JMBG za sve (@JMBGzasve) June 18, 2013

The baby girl had to be diagnosed with tracheoesophageal fistula (a hole between gullet and windpipe), the parent having faith in Bosnian and Herzegovinian facilities first got her diagnosed in Sarajevo but had to face the failure. Later, when they wanted to take her to Germany for better treatment, they could not do so as the parents were unable to obtain a passport for the baby because she was not registered with a PIN due to this legal gap. The parents then had to take their child to Belgrade in the neighbouring Serbia by illegally crossing the border. Parents claimed that a lot of time was wasted to persuade the Serbian border police to understand the case of emergency and let the baby in without the passport.
Parents though had successfully made to Belgrade, and the Serbian doctors started the treatment. I can understand the legal gap could not have been rectified immediately that day, but at least the government could have helped the baby on human ground, but Bosnian and Herzegovinian authorities refused to pay for the surgery. Even after so much efforts made by the parents, they had to accept the bad news of her death as she contracted infection. 
If there would have been no delay made at the Serbian border may be she would have been saved, but we can’t blame the Serbian border police. They were just doing their duty. The lawmakers in Bosnia and Herzegovina should be blamed. When you realize that hundreds of thousands of families want to give the best care to their baby child in a country whose under 5 mortality rate is 8, and infant mortality rate is 7.
This sad incidence has united the people of Bosnia and Herzegovina regardless of their ethnicity and religion for the first time since the end of 1992-95 war.
Now along with the adoption of the law on JMBG and filling this legal gap, protesters also demand creation of a state solidarity fund that would finance the treatment of citizen abroad if they did not find proper facilities and treatment in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Protesters are also demanding that MPs and minister of Council of Ministers should give up 30% of their salary which is six times the national average in favour of the proposed solidarity fund for the time they are in office. To ensure the protest goes smoothly, protesters also demand that protesters should not be prosecuted or subjected to brutal measures by the authority. Please read #jmbg manifesto for more information.
The protests started on June 5th and it is already three weeks but we have not heard it in media. We have been hearing about Turkey and Brazil where the protests have taken a violent turn, although the protests in Bulgaria and Bosnia have been peaceful until now. 
It is not just about Bosnia and Herzegovina, this can happen everywhere. Therefore I urge every citizen who believes in a change in society must follow and support this protest, you will get more information on its official website and following the conversation on twitter and Facebook #jmbg. All the individual bloggers must come out and write about it and offer support to the citizen of Bosnia and Herzegovina whatever is possible in your capacity. Share this post and spread the word. Recently it has been declared by the government that those supporting the protests online will be identified and punished. People in Bosnia are not scared of it. Let us internationally provide support and platform for the protesters to continue on this noble cause.

Dedicate Your 15 Minutes for the Noble Cause

On World Social Media day on 30th June a hashmob is organized known as baby Revolution or Babylution where we all will gather online for 15 minutes to support the #JMBG protests in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Please go here and join the movement. 30th June is also the deadline given by the protesters to the government to meet their demands. This will be the world’s first hashmob on Facebook (Facebook is more popular in Bosnia and Herzegovina). Be the proud part of it and let us support our brothers and sisters in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

+Sanskar Shrivastava is the founder of The World Reporter open students’ journalism. His motive is to make media more free which is sometimes used as a tool that can affect a healthy democracy by influencing the view of the mass with its opinion, there should be equal democracy inside media as well without any predefined approach, and this is possible when every citizen is given power to express their views.

Please share and join the discussion on facebook by clicking the “Like” below.
Visit The World Reporter for discussion on this post. Or you may like to know what others are saying on this topic.
Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse

Sanskar Shrivastava is the founder of international students' journal, The World Reporter. Passionate about dynamic occurrence in geopolitics, Sanskar has been studying and analyzing geopolitcal events from early life. At present, Sanskar is a student at the Russian Centre of Science and Culture and will be moving to Duke University.

Continue Reading


What a Rising Xi Jinping Means for China and the World

Manak Suri



Xi Jinping China


“Watch this man.” These were the three words used by the founding father of Singapore Lee Kuan Yew to describe a relatively unknown Xi Jinping while he was yet to become the President of the People’s Republic of China. Today, in addition to being China’s “paramount leader”, Xi is arguably the most powerful man in the world, and even if leaders across the world were doubtful about it till now, the developments in the previous week were sure to make them think again.

19th Party Congress: How it unfolded

Xi today, Xi forever?

The Communist Party of China assembled the previous week for its 19th Party Congress, a political summit that takes place every five years to decide upon the country’s future and the future is precisely what Xi has fixated his eyes upon. According to the current rules, Mr Xi must step down as the leader when his term ends in 2022 and as tradition dictates, a successor must be appointed. While only time will reveal whether Mr Xi steps down from the presidency at the end of his term, it increasingly looks that he is not keen to do so, having failed to hint towards any successor for the time being. His apparent intentions to stay put were further solidified with the appointment of the new members to the Politburo Standing Committee, the highest decision making authority in the country after the president. Each of the members appointed to the body is over 60 years of age, which means that they are highly likely to retire when their term comes to an end with the next meeting five years later. Interestingly, two-thirds of them are also known to be Mr Xi’s loyalists.

Xi Jinping Thought: A force to be reckoned with

“Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era” or the “Xi Jinping Thought” for short was written into the party’s constitution at the end of the Congress. The thought consists of 14 principles calling for deep reforms, conserving the environment, the party’s complete control over the army, and the importance of the unification of the country. The development was highly publicised and with good reason. With the “Xi Jinping Thought” embedded in the constitution while still being in power, Xi Jinping has drawn comparisons from all over the world to Mao Zedong himself. Moreover, he has ensured that anyone that opposes him will do so at the cost of their removal from the party. When Xi asked the delegates at the end of his address for any objections, shouts of “meiyou” which means “none” rang through the Great Hall of the People.

Mr Xi has declared the start of a “new era” for China, and undoubtedly for the entire world. It is therefore important to ask what significance these developments hold for the country and for the world at large.

What this means for China

The inclusion of Xi’s thought in the constitution means that the same will be taught in schools, colleges, and other institutions throughout the country, infusing his ideology among the Chinese on a cultural level. Abraham Denmark, director of the Asia program at the Wilson Center puts it aptly when he says that the move “greatly increases, … broadens, and deepens Xi Jinping’s personal power within the Chinese system”.

The president has already found a wide support of the Chinese population with his push for modernisation and his crackdown on corruption has been hugely popular among the masses. Since his election in 2012, Mr Xi’s anti-corruption drive, famously known within the country as the “tiger and flies campaign” has either disciplined or expelled nearly a million party members. As his stance on corruption remains as stern as ever, many have come to view it as a political tool used by him time and again to get rid of political rivals. However, the corruption drive has undoubtedly proved to be effective and fruitful for the country’s business climate.

While Mr Xi’s crackdown on corruption has garnered immense coverage, the crackdown on humans rights activists and NGOs has not received its fair share. China has struggled for decades in its battle for free speech. In 2015, many human rights lawyers were detained and many international NGOs faced stricter curbs to keep them from functioning. As the president has left little room for any opposition within the party, the authoritarianism and censorship are by no means expected to be relaxed, ensuring that there is no opposition from outside the party as well.

Powerplay: China’s standing on the global stage

Donald Trump was among the world leaders who wished the Chinese president when he congratulated him on his “extraordinary elevation”. The reverence he holds for Mr Xi was quite apparent when he said: “some people might call him the king of China.” The surprise, however, came when North Korea’s Kim Jong Un congratulated the president on his “great success” since the two leaders are not known to be fond of each other. The intent here is clear. Both sides need a China that is continuously growing in power on their side in their stand against each other, and that means a closer association with Mr Xi. Chinese influence in the world is unlikely to stop there.

While speaking to CNN, James McGregor, author of “No Ancient Wisdom, No Followers: The Challenges of Chinese Authoritarian Capitalism”, mentioned that “given the chaos in Washington and also the dysfunction in Europe, the world is looking for leadership.” Mr Xi enjoys a great level of stability and largely unquestioned authority in a time where the leaders of Western democracies face intense competition at home. As such, his message to his party and to the world is clear: in the coming decades, China will “stand proudly among the nations of the world” and “become a leading global power. ” However, it will do so on its own terms, emphatically rejecting the Western political models.

These intentions are perhaps best evidenced by The Belt and Road initiative, China’s attempt at connecting Europe, Asia, and Africa with each other through a modern take on the Silk Route, into which it has already pumped hundreds of billions as loans and aid to countries across all three continents. While the project has been met with opposition from Japan, India, and the USA, many of China’s neighbours have expressed their support for it, which speaks of its influence on the global stage.

With the people’s army under the control of the party, Mr Xi also looks to achieve the twin goals of increasing the military might and the protection of China’s sovereignty. “We will not tolerate anyone, using any means, at any time to separate one inch of land from China”, he said in his address which is seen as a warning to both Hong Kong and Taiwan. Enhancing combat capability is also linked to the Chinese interests in the South China Sea, where its activities of building and militarisation of islands have received backlash from the international community.

“If one is big”, Mr Xi said on the final day of the Congress, “one must act big.” There’s no doubt that Mr Xi intends to put these words into action at the global level. Lee Kuan Yew once rightly pointed out about China that the world would do well to remember:  “The size of China’s displacement of the world balance is such that the world must find a new balance. It is not possible to pretend that this is just another big player. This is the biggest player in the history of the world.”


Prev postNext post
Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse

Continue Reading


UK Attempts To Bypass European Commission On Brexit Blocked By Brussels



Brexit European Union

Via geographos

As the UK and EU draw deeper and deeper into uncharted waters, Brexit negotiations are becoming increasingly erratic. As negotiators from both states met this week to discuss items such as the Northern Ireland Border, the rights of EU citizens currently residing in the UK and the notorious ‘divorce bill’, there have been numerous reports of frustration within the British camp.


Recently it was revealed that Prime Minister Theresa May, believing talks to be at an impasse, intended to go over the heads of the EU’s Brexit negotiators and appeal directly to world leaders such as Angela Merkel and Emmanuel Macron. When questioned about this, however, Brussels officials close to the negotiations intimated that Mrs May would not be able to circumvent the negotiations process.

The officials pointed out that both French and German leaders had agreed prior to the talks that negotiations would come “as a single package” where “individual items cannot be settled separately” and that no member state would abstain from negotiations in favour of individual agreements.

One year on…

It has been over a year now since the UK referendum in which the country voted (at a rate of 52% to 48%) to leave the European Union in an unprecedented political and economic chain of events, the repercussions of which will take years to fully realise but which the world glibly knows as Brexit. It’s a small name for such a political leviathan. Many of the world’s leading bankers and economists still aren’t sure what to make of. Recently CEO Lloyds Bank Antonio Horta-Osorio (who has been lauded for restoring the bank’s profits to pre-financial crisis levels) expressed doubt and uncertainty over the long term economic effects of Brexit. It’s somewhat telling that former Prime Minister David Cameron resigned shortly after the vote, claiming that his involvement in the ‘Remain’ campaign put him at odds with the will of the people but it’s possible that he had the prescience to realise that he had no hope of taming this wily and unpredictable beast. One year on, the beast only seems to have become further enraged by the negotiating process.

Difficult negotiations

Theresa May has gone into Brexit negotiations with some questionably aggressive negotiating tactics. The first round of talks were mired by her strangely audacious assertion that “no deal is better than a bad deal”. The frustration has clearly been felt on both sides with chief negotiator Michel Barnier urging Mrs May to begin negotiating “seriously”. The French government also demonstrated an unwillingness to circumvent negotiations earlier this week, stating that it “fully supports, on the substance as well as on the method, Michel Barnier’s negotiating mandate” and asserting that claims that Mrs May can somehow bypass the procedure “are founded on absolutely nothing and do not reflect reality”. Brexit Minister David Davis, however, retains an optimistic tone, stating;

“Our goal remains the same: we want to agree a deal that works in the best interests for both the European Union and the United Kingdom and people and businesses right across Europe. We’re ready to roll up our sleeves and get back to work once more…”.

Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse

Continue Reading


Jeff Sessions Is Planning to Go After States Legalizing Medical Marijuana



shisha marijuana smoke

Republican Senator Jeff Sessions apparently wrote a personal letter in May to Congress, asking it to remove the medical marijuana protections that had been in place for four years. That ban was put in place by the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment. President Trump’s signed spending bill extended the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment through the end of 2017, and Senator Sessions wants to repeal it.

The Details of the Letter

Republican Senator Jeff Sessions asked Congress to repeal the ban the Department of Justice had been following that prohibited the Feds from going after medical marijuana suppliers in states where it had been legalized. In short, the ban prevents the federal government from enforcing federal drug law in states where medical marijuana has passed, and he’s asking Congress to lift the ban so that federal law is applied equally to all states – including those that legalized medical marijuana.

The Impact If Passed

If the ban were lifted, the Department of Justice would regain the authority to enforce the Controlled Substances Act and shut down medical marijuana distributors. The federal government could then shut down medical marijuana in states that legalized it, including Colorado’s very recent approval of it. Everyone, from growers to dispensary workers to medical marijuana patients, would now be subject to potential DEA prosecution. However, as of this writing, Congress has not issued a response to Senator Session’s request.

Why the Legal Shift Wouldn’t Actually Help

The intent is to go after drug addiction that is harmful, though one can argue the policy is misguided since it is opioid addiction and overdose that is responsible for the rising death rate among the poor, not medical marijuana. The end result of criminalized medical marijuana would thus increase drug convictions and incarcerations, but not the growing addiction and death rates it is intended to address.

There is growing evidence that medical marijuana can help those addicted to opioids, and penalizing medical marijuana may end up undermining the potential treatment of the opioid addiction epidemic. The stated desire to fight crime is an honorable intention but isn’t furthered by this legislative change, since violent crime rates actually go down when medical marijuana is legalized.

Scientists like Raphael Mechoulam have been working for years on educating people on the various benefits of marijuana and a vast majority of constituents truly believe in its benefits in treating conditions such as glaucoma, depression, and alleviating pain associated with chemotherapy and AIDs.

The Scalise Shooting

The June 14th shooting of several Republican officials by liberal, pro-medical marijuana Bernie Sanders supporter, James Hodgkinson, might fuel the fire of some hardline Republicans. Violence in the name of various political causes is often used to rally various bases against a cause. Hardline Republicans might use these actions to completely de-legitimize the benefits of medical marijuana. 

The medical marijuana debate has been resolved to date by the Feds essentially leaving the issue to the individual states, regardless of federal drug laws that make medical marijuana illegal. Senator Sessions asked Congress to repeal the amendment that allowed for this de facto state-based solution. Congress to date has done nothing while President Trump seems fine with leaving things as they are.

Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse

Continue Reading