|Libyan Uprise: Image from Flickr|
As the tension in Libya escalates, on Thursday Gadaffi said he will show no mercy and pity on rebels who want him down. Rebels, who are weaker compared to Libyan loyal military, have now asked for foreign aid to tackle any assault by the Military, loyal to Gadaffi.
While American warships have already reached near Libya, most of the nations are against any military intervention or imposing a no-fly zone there. BRIC and G4 nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) have clearly opposed any foreign military action in Libya and are blocking any resolution in UN, which could grant give green chit to military intervention. India is a non permanent member of security council whereas Russia and China has veto power. If All three are not influenced then such resolution can not pass.
At the EU summit on 11 March Romanian President Traian Băsescu said, “Among the arguments I want to bring in order to support our position is that this mission of initiating a no-fly zone is a mission that only NATO can have and not the EU. We also consider it is not the moment for a military solution in Libya”. Romania is a member of both NATO and EU. Both Romania and Bulgaria opposed the idea of international intervention in Libya. According to EU observer electronic publication, during the European Council it took the intervention of the German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, to calm things down between French President and Romania, Bulgaria.
The only countries which back no-flying zone and possible military interventions in Libya are US, UK and France. Italy is supporting a no-flying zone in Libya as UN has also declared it. Groups like NATO and Arab League also supports no-flying zone immediately. Canada, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Qatar, UAE, Spain have expressed their desire to help NATO and UN for any military intervention, whereas Poland and Lithuania will only support by providing humanitarian aid and evacuation of Libyan people. No flying zone has been declared but implication has not been done yet.
Most of the country are only thinking of whether to go for military intervention or not, none of them has taken any actual military action against Libya so far. The countries which have directly or indirectly supported Libyan rebels are Tunisia, Egypt and Qatar (Tunisia and Egypt are the possible inspiration for the Egypt Rebels)
The countries which have reportedly helped current Libyan government are Syria and Algeria, by supplying men and weapons to Colonel Moammar Gaddafi. It is believed that Syrian pilots are flying Libyan Mig 23 and Mig 25. A Belorussian Ilyushin Il-76 aircraft left a military base near the Belarussian city of Baranovichi and landed at the Libyan desert airport of Sebha on 15 February sending military equipment, (Source: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute). Zimbabwe is also sending mercenaries to support Gaddaffi.
Gaddafi has been ruling Libya since 1969, overthrowing the monarchy. Following the retirement of Fidel Castro in 2008 and the death of Omar Bongo in 2009, Gaddafi is the world’s longest-ruling head of the state. Though the standard of living and literacy rate is considered good in Libya, corruption, investing more than what is necessary in military and arms import and suspected promotion of terror around the world cause him lose popularity and faith of others.
Some of the major reasons of opposing military intervention in Libya is the fear of another Iraq, as the war never ended there and the situation became even worse. Western power became so unpopular and the world criticized them. The increasing interference by US and allies in Muslim countries might provoke some extremists group even more and might become a threat to the world.
Supporters of the military intervention, specially US, which is a promoter of democracy, believe that an end of dictatorship in Libya is necessary. West can gain a lot if a pro western government is setup in the nation, Libya being an oil and gas rich nation.
Scroll down if you are looking for comment form, your comment is very much appreciated!!
From Revolution to Rebellion: Libya and the Tuareg
Nomadic people that live across mainly 5 countries, Algeria, Libya, Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso, the Tuareg are also called the ‘blue men of the desert’. This has to do with the dark blue turbans that leave stains on their skins. Their number can be only estimated and it is allegedly close to 3 million with another 1 million exiles spread over many other countries.
Apart from a rich culture, tradition and history the Tuareg also provide us with a case study for unintended consequences of humanitarian intervention. More specifically, in this short piece of writing I will explore the results of the Libyan revolution and the Gadaffi regime-change in terms of Tuareg rebellion in Northern Mali.
In February 2011 the Arab Revolution touched Libya where Colonel Gaddafi was fighting the rebels with large support of his Tuareg brave Saharan friends for whom during the 1970s and 1980s he set up training camps. It is fascinating to see how the Colonel himself has been symbolically perpetuating a romantic view of the nomadic lifestyle through his clothing and by hosting international leaders in his everywhere-travelling famous Bedouin tent.
Much could be said about the ideological motivations behind the Tuareg support in Libya. However, the material aspect should not be downplayed. It is reported that the promised payment for the fighting was of about $10.000 to join up and of $1000 for each day of risking the life. Most of the time this can be the only source of income for the families making a living in the dry desert. The energy deposits that could spur development in this region are not well managed and the northern areas where the Tuareg are located are often marginalised by the central authorities.
After Gadaffi had been overthrown with NATO support and executed by the angry mob, his former Malian Tuareg allies found themselves armed and ready to reclaim their ancestral land. The creation of a new rebel group called the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (MNLA) would also bring to life a competitor in the shape of an Islamist military rebel group, Ansar Dine which is aligned with Al-Qaeda. The MNLA rebellious attacks commenced in January 2012 with the aim of taking over Northern Mali.
An internationally condemned coup d’etat followed due to military dissatisfaction with President Touré’s handling of the crisis and eventually with renewed offences the MNLA got control over the three main cities in the north, Kidal, Gao and Timbuktu. Nonetheless, Ansar Dine had some military success of its own which ended up in claims over the same territory.
By the summer of 2012, Mali was being torn between three centres of power: the military junta which turned authority over to Interim President Traoré, the secular nationalist movement of MNLA which had raised the flag of Azawad over Gao ( a declaration of independence rejected by the EU and the African Union) and the Salafist Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM)/ Ansar Dine who hold Timbuktu. In June 2012, the Tuareg rebels were force to flee Northern Mali while the Islamists took over their conquered lands.
The course of events surely did not end here but for our analysis this time frame is more than enough. It enables us to draw several lessons from this unfortunate situation. First, it confirms that intervention in another sovereign country ought to be of last resort. Regime-change tends to be a dangerous foreign policy since the power vacuum created allows for chaos and competing destructive interest to tear apart the social and economic order of the place in question. Some would argue that transition assistance could safely take the process to conclusion, but I think this is as risky because the local population will have a hard time accepting foreign meddling in their business.
Second, I think it would be wrong to blame entirely NATO for the aftermath. As we can observe throughout the historical record, separatist impulses and even attempts have been present in Tuareg regions. There is no certainty as to how stable and unshaken the status quo would have been in the Sahara desert had Gadaffi not been killed. The fact remains he was a strong supporter of the Tuareg cause. The honesty of his support would have ultimately been tested by the Azawad rebels. With which consequences? There could be two; one is that Gadaffi’s help would have been decisive in stabilizing the Azawad aspirations. Second, his distaste for Islamist movements could have kept the AQIM out of Mali at the expense of a more autonomous north.
Nevertheless, the alternative still remains that a deeper rupture in the Saharan countries could have appeared if Gadaffi had decided to get totally and directly involved in bringing about the goals of Tuareg self-determination in all the places where they are located. An all-out conflict in Algeria, Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger under the lead of the Colonel would surely attract a stronger Islamist coalition force and NATO ‘boots on the ground’ with thousands of lives lost and another never-ending war between multiple centres of power.
In conclusion, it is difficult to say if NATO’s intervention in Libya was successful or not for the region. Only time will tell. What we can say for sure is that the unintended consequences are costly in human lives, political credibility and prestige, and for African security. It appears to the outside world as if one bad situation turned into a worse one. This lack of improvement is frustrating for any peaceful ideal.
Before we end our journey in the Tuareg land, I would suggest listening to some traditional music here. It is the sound of hope and it might put a smile on our faces despite the dramatic contemporary events surrounding this enigmatic people.
Pro Gaddafi’s Forces Captured Bani Walid, 5 NTC Troops Killed, 30 Injured
International Reaction on Gaddaffi’s Death
|Image from Guardian.com|
The United Nations
Secretary General Ban Ki-moon
“This day marks a historic transition for Libya. In the coming days, we will witness scenes of celebration as well as grief for those who lost so much. Now is the time for all Libyans to come together. Libyans can only realise the promise of the future for national unity and reconciliation. Combatants on all sides must lay down their arms in peace. This is the time for healing and rebuilding, for generosity of spirit, not for revenge.”
President Barack Obama
“The United States, along with our European allies and Arab partners, must now deepen our support for the Libyan people, as they work to make the next phase of their democratic revolution as successful as the fight to free their country.”
Keith Ellison, the first Muslim elected to the US Congress
The European Union’s Reaction
“The death of Gaddafi marks the end of an era of despotism, said Herman Van Rompuy, the bloc’s president. That Gaddafi died in a raid in Sirte means an end also to the repression from which the Libyan people have suffered for too long.”
Prime Minister David Cameron
“People in Libya today have an even greater chance after this news of building themselves a strong and democratic future.”
Reaction of Russia’s NATO envoy and the leader of the Congress of Russian Communities, Dmitry Rogozin, First Deputy Chairman of Russia’s Communist Party’s Central Committee and Deputy Speaker of the State Duma Ivan Melnikov. Russia’s Reaction on Gaddaffi’s Death, Remarks from US.
“Now the war is over.”
President Nicolas Sarkozy
“The disappearance of Muammar Gaddafi is a major step forward in the battle fought for more than eight months by the Libyan people to liberate themselves from the dictatorial and violent regime imposed on them for more than 40 years.”
Chancellor Angela Merkel
“With this, a bloody war comes to an end, which Gaddafi led against his own people. Libya must now quickly take further resolute steps towards democracy and make the achievments so far of the Arab Spring irreversible.”
The African Union’s Reaction
“The African Union lifted its suspension of Libya’s membership and said in a statement it would authorise the current authorities in Libya to occupy the seat of Libya in the AU and its organs.”
Know The Differences between Static and Dynamic QR Codes
The technological advances in physical and occupational physiotherapy that you should know about
Here’s How to Boost Employee Satisfaction Today
Tighten Up Your Customer Service In These Ways
How to Supercharge Your Construction Company’s Customer Service
Technology11 months ago
What are spamtraps and how to get them off your mailing list for good?
Business8 months ago
Do’s and Don’t’s of Firing People
Business11 months ago
Turn Your Passion into a Career: How to Make Money Doing What You Love
Sports12 months ago
Discover the best sports accessories shop
Business9 months ago
Best Strategies to Create an Comfortable Atmosphere in Your Restaurant
Business11 months ago
Top Tips for Moving Your Business to an Office
Sports11 months ago
The popularity of role-playing games and the desire for the most spectacular miniatures is growing
Health12 months ago
10 Tips for Starting Your Own Architectural Firm